News  |  Nigeria  |  National  

Edo guber poll: PDP closes case at tribunal

By NAN   |   10 February 2017   |   7:30 pm

PDP governorship candidate in the Edo State governorship election, Osagie Ize-Iyamu voting at Iguododo Primary School during the election in Edo state. PHOTO: NAN

The Peoples Democratic Party(PDP) and Osagie Ize-Iyamu, its candidate in the Sept. 28, 2016 governorship election, on Friday closed their case before the Justice Ahmed Badamasi-led three-member election petition tribunal in Benin.

The petitioners are challenging the declaration by the Independent National Election Commission(INEC) of Mr Godwin Obaseki as winner of the election. The petitioners had named the INEC, Obaseki and the All Progressives Congress (APC) as first, second and third respondents respectively in the petition.

INEC had declared Obaseki of APC winner of the Edo governorship election after he polled 319,483 votes to defeat Ize-Iyamu, his closest rival, who scored a total of over 250,000 votes.

The petitioners, who alleged that the election was fraught with electoral irregularities in some units and wards in the 18 local government areas of the state, are asking the tribunal to declare Ize-Iyamu as winner.

They had 14 days to prove their cases and stated in their pleadings that they would call more than1,000 witnesses. The petitioners also requested for the recounting in court of used ballot papers in the election. They were, however, able to call only 91 witnesses before the expiration of the allotted time.

Mr Ahmed Salman, INEC administrative officer, on subpoena, on Tuesday, had produced several bags in court containing used ballot papers for Egor, Akoko-Edo, Etsako-East and Estako-West, respectively.

Counting of the papers in all the four local government areas was still on when Mr Ken Mozia (SAN), counsel for Obaseki, at 1 pm, drew the attention of the tribunal to the fact that 14 days allotted for the petitioners to prove their case had expired.

Following the observation, Mr Yusuf Ali (SAN), counsel to the petitioners, prayed the tribunal to allow for the continuation of counting since the process commenced within the 14- day period.

However, the respondents’ counsel objected to the request.

The tribunal, after arguments from the petitioners and respondents’ counsel, ruled against the application for continuation of counting, since it had gone beyond the prescribed 14-day period.

Ali thereafter orally applied to the tribunal that the result of the counting within time should be made known to the tribunal, which the respondents also objected to.

But the tribunal chairman upheld Ali’s prayer and ruled that the tribunal’s registrar should furnish it with the outcome of the counting on or before Monday.

Badamasi also ruled that copies of the information should be served on both the petitioners and respondents, and adjourned till Tuesday for INEC to open its defence.




  • godwin

    During the election, it did not take more than 3 days to count the ballot papers. Why is it now impossible to count these same used ballot papers in 14 days?

You may also like